logo
logo

Federal Agencies in Disarray Over DOGE Email Directive

Society


sparksAI summary
Display highlights
  • OPM email demands accomplishments, threatens resignation if ignored
  • Conflicting guidance received across federal agencies
  • Federal judges and military personnel also affected
  • National security concerns and disruptions highlighted
  • FBI director advises against responding, adding to uncertainty
360 summary
  • Everett Kelley, President of AFGE, criticized the directive as disrespectful to veterans and condemned Elon Musk's involvement.
  • Doreen Greenwald, President of NTEU, labeled the email as "completely un-American" and emphasized the professionalism of civil servants.
  • Elon Musk responded to criticism by highlighting the quick nature of the required responses and mentioned the positive feedback received from employees.
TIMETIME
  • Concerns raised about the potential consequences of responses or non-responses to the directive, with fears of mass firings among federal employees.
  • Questions raised about the efficiency and cost implications of having federal employees dedicate time to respond to the email directive.
  • Uncertainty among federal workers regarding the review process for the replies and the lack of communication from supervisors on how to proceed.
Business InsiderBusiness Insider
  • FBI Director Kash Patel advised employees to hold their replies, asserting the agency's autonomy in evaluating its personnel.
  • Confusion arose as the email directive, intended for the executive branch, also reached judiciary employees, including judges and law clerks.
  • A Department of Justice official highlighted the legal implications, stating that handling classified material prevented them from responding to the email.
nymag.com
  • A Commerce Department employee expressed skepticism towards the email, comparing it to common phishing examples in training sessions, leading to a reluctance to respond.
  • A federal employee criticized Musk and DOGE for causing distress to civil servants, suggesting a perception of deliberate harm towards federal workers.
  • Minnesota senator Tina Smith condemned the email request, labeling Musk as a "billionaire asshole boss" and drawing parallels to negative experiences with demanding superiors.
nymag.com
  • Some workers at the National Institutes of Health were instructed to await guidance, diverting their attention from critical national security tasks.
  • Employees are grappling with how to respond to the directive, as limitations on sharing classified information hinder their ability to comply effectively.
  • The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is deliberating on guidelines for sharing information externally, causing delays in responding to the directive.
WIREDWIRED
ExploreThe above information is compiled by TIME、Business Insider、nymag.com、WIRED and does not represent any position of Arbor. It does not constitute any investment advice made by Arbor. Before making any investment decisions, investors should consider the risk factors related to the investment products based on their own circumstances and seek advice from professional investment advisors if necessary. We strive to ensure but cannot guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, and originality of the above content, and we make no promises or guarantees in this regard. As machine learning has a probabilistic nature, it may lead to incorrect reflection of facts in certain situations. You should appropriately evaluate the accuracy of any information summary based on your usage, including through manual evaluation of the information summary. We are not responsible for any losses or liabilities incurred by you due to your use, viewing, and access of the platform or failure to do so.
mobile

Remove Duplicated Information

app-iconLess is More
app-icon
Applicable for iOS and Android systems
Follow Us
logo
All rights reserved © 2025 Arbor.